mirror of
https://github.com/jemalloc/jemalloc.git
synced 2026-05-26 23:06:30 +03:00
Implement the *allocx() API, which is a successor to the *allocm() API.
The *allocx() functions are slightly simpler to use because they have
fewer parameters, they directly return the results of primary interest,
and mallocx()/rallocx() avoid the strict aliasing pitfall that
allocm()/rallocx() share with posix_memalign(). The following code
violates strict aliasing rules:
foo_t *foo;
allocm((void **)&foo, NULL, 42, 0);
whereas the following is safe:
foo_t *foo;
void *p;
allocm(&p, NULL, 42, 0);
foo = (foo_t *)p;
mallocx() does not have this problem:
foo_t *foo = (foo_t *)mallocx(42, 0);
51 lines
1 KiB
C
51 lines
1 KiB
C
#include "test/jemalloc_test.h"
|
|
|
|
TEST_BEGIN(test_grow_and_shrink)
|
|
{
|
|
void *p, *q;
|
|
size_t tsz;
|
|
#define NCYCLES 3
|
|
unsigned i, j;
|
|
#define NSZS 2500
|
|
size_t szs[NSZS];
|
|
#define MAXSZ ZU(12 * 1024 * 1024)
|
|
|
|
p = mallocx(1, 0);
|
|
assert_ptr_not_null(p, "Unexpected mallocx() error");
|
|
szs[0] = sallocx(p, 0);
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < NCYCLES; i++) {
|
|
for (j = 1; j < NSZS && szs[j-1] < MAXSZ; j++) {
|
|
q = rallocx(p, szs[j-1]+1, 0);
|
|
assert_ptr_not_null(q,
|
|
"Unexpected rallocx() error for size=%zu-->%zu",
|
|
szs[j-1], szs[j-1]+1);
|
|
szs[j] = sallocx(q, 0);
|
|
assert_zu_ne(szs[j], szs[j-1]+1,
|
|
"Expected size to at least: %zu", szs[j-1]+1);
|
|
p = q;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (j--; j > 0; j--) {
|
|
q = rallocx(p, szs[j-1], 0);
|
|
assert_ptr_not_null(q,
|
|
"Unexpected rallocx() error for size=%zu-->%zu",
|
|
szs[j], szs[j-1]);
|
|
tsz = sallocx(q, 0);
|
|
assert_zu_eq(tsz, szs[j-1],
|
|
"Expected size=%zu, got size=%zu", szs[j-1], tsz);
|
|
p = q;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
dallocx(p, 0);
|
|
}
|
|
TEST_END
|
|
|
|
int
|
|
main(void)
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return (test(
|
|
test_grow_and_shrink));
|
|
}
|