- test 1030: remove, duplicate of 154
- test 1105: make name unique
- test 161: make name reflect what it tests
- test 2074: correct the name
- test 310: improve name
- test 358: correct the name
- test 409: removed, duplicate of 401
- test 472: clarify the test name (how it differs from 439)
- test 1509: update name
- test 527: duplicate of 526
- test 758: separate the name from 530
- test 611: duplicate of 608, remove
- test 639: adjust the name
- test 688: minor name tweak to clarify
- test 708: enhance name
- test 800/847: clarify the names
- test 1520: dedupe the name
- test 962: enhance name
- test 1196/2203: enhanced names
- test 1211: name tweak
- test 1256/1257: enhance the names
- test 1483: fix name
- test 1541: fix name
- test 1553: fix name
- test 1609: removed, exact duplicate of 1607
- test 2200: fix name
- test 3031: corret the name
- test 3016/3203: fix names and keywords
- test 3201/3220: enhance names
- test 3212: fix name
- add missing FILE keywords
- drop FAILURE as keyword
Closes#21936
To formalize they are now XML-compliant (with some asterisks.)
Also to help syntax highlighters work on them to make their content more
readable.
Also:
- Delete empty comment decorations.
- GHA/checksrc: simplify XML check.
- runtests: fail to load test data with XML prolog missing.
Follow-up to bfe6eb1c06#19927
Follow-up to 87ba80a6dfCloses#19946
Only actually needed servers should be listed and none is then implied
if no servers are listed.
Outputs a warning if "none" is still set as a server.
Closes#18466
The threee tags `<name>`, `</name>` and `<command>` were frequently used
with a leading space that this removes. The reason this habbit is so
widespread in testcases is probably that they have been copy and pasted.
Hence, fixing them all now might curb this practice from now on.
Closes#12028
It is still possible to override the executable to run during the test,
using the <tool> tag, but this patch removes the requirement that the
tag must be present for unit tests.
It also removes the possibility of human error when existing test cases
are used as the basis for new tests, as recently witnessed in 81c37124.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stenberg
Closes#4976
