stop using the word 'just'

Everywhere. In documentation and code comments.

It is almost never a good word and almost always a filler that should be
avoided.

Closes #20793
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Stenberg 2026-03-02 23:41:35 +01:00
parent 4b583b7585
commit b4dba346cd
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 5CC908FDB71E12C2
213 changed files with 727 additions and 772 deletions

View file

@ -57,9 +57,9 @@ There should be a documented URL format. If there is an RFC for it there is no
question about it but the syntax does not have to be a published RFC. It could
be enough if it is already in use by other implementations.
If you make up the syntax just in order to be able to propose it to curl, then
you are in a bad place. URLs are designed and defined for interoperability.
There should at least be a good chance that other clients and servers can be
If you make up the syntax in order to be able to propose it to curl, then you
are in a bad place. URLs are designed and defined for interoperability. There
should at least be a good chance that other clients and servers can be
implemented supporting the same URL syntax and work the same or similar way.
URLs work on registered 'schemes'. There is a register of [all officially
@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ to curl and immediately once the code had been merged, the originator vanished
from the face of the earth. That is fine, but we need to take the necessary
precautions so when it happens we are still fine.
Our test infrastructure is powerful enough to test just about every possible
protocol - but it might require a bit of an effort to make it happen.
Our test infrastructure is powerful enough to test almost every protocol - but
it might require a bit of an effort to make it happen.
## Documentation