docs: reduce/avoid English contractions

You're => You are
Hasn't => Has not
Doesn't => Does not
Don't => Do not
You'll => You will
etc

Closes #7930
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Stenberg 2021-10-31 16:34:44 +01:00
parent d3d079c138
commit a28464ae77
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 5CC908FDB71E12C2
265 changed files with 926 additions and 925 deletions

View file

@ -24,12 +24,12 @@
When using said CA bundle to verify a server cert, you will experience
problems if your CA store does not contain the certificates for the
intermediates if the server doesn't provide them.
intermediates if the server does not provide them.
The TLS protocol mandates that the intermediate certificates are sent in the
handshake, but as browsers have ways to survive or work around such
omissions, missing intermediates in TLS handshakes still happen that
browser-users won't notice.
browser-users will not notice.
Browsers work around this problem in two ways: they cache intermediate
certificates from previous transfers and some implement the TLS "AIA"
@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
## Ciphers
Clients give servers a list of ciphers to select from. If the list doesn't
Clients give servers a list of ciphers to select from. If the list does not
include any ciphers the server wants/can use, the connection handshake
fails.
@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
BEAST is the name of a TLS 1.0 attack that surfaced 2011. When adding means
to mitigate this attack, it turned out that some broken servers out there in
the wild didn't work properly with the BEAST mitigation in place.
the wild did not work properly with the BEAST mitigation in place.
To make such broken servers work, the --ssl-allow-beast option was
introduced. Exactly as it sounds, it re-introduces the BEAST vulnerability
@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
depending on the OS or build configuration. The --ssl-no-revoke option was
introduced in 7.44.0 to disable revocation checking but currently is only
supported for Schannel (the native Windows SSL library), with an exception
in the case of Windows' Untrusted Publishers block list which it seems can't
in the case of Windows' Untrusted Publishers block list which it seems cannot
be bypassed. This option may have broader support to accommodate other SSL
backends in the future.