docs: reduce/avoid English contractions

You're => You are
Hasn't => Has not
Doesn't => Does not
Don't => Do not
You'll => You will
etc

Closes #7930
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Stenberg 2021-10-31 16:34:44 +01:00
parent d3d079c138
commit a28464ae77
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 5CC908FDB71E12C2
265 changed files with 926 additions and 925 deletions

View file

@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ you are up for a tough argument.
### URL
There should be a documented URL format. If there is an RFC for it there is no
question about it but the syntax doesn't have to be a published RFC. It could
question about it but the syntax does not have to be a published RFC. It could
be enough if it is already in use by other implementations.
If you make up the syntax just in order to be able to propose it to curl, then
@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ As much of the protocol implementation as possible needs to be verified by
curl test cases. We must have the implementation get tested by CI jobs,
torture tests and more.
We've experienced many times in the past how new implementations were brought
We have experienced many times in the past how new implementations were brought
to curl and immediately once the code had been merged, the originator vanished
from the face of the earth. That is fine, but we need to take the necessary
precautions so when it happens we are still fine.
@ -100,11 +100,11 @@ little easier!
The protocol specification itself should be freely available without requiring
any NDA or similar.
## Don't compare
## Do not compare
We are constantly raising the bar and we are constantly improving the
project. A lot of things we did in the past would not be acceptable if done
today. Therefore, you might be tempted to use shortcuts or "hacks" you can
spot other - existing - protocol implementations have used, but there is
nothing to gain from that. The bar has been raised. Former "cheats" won't be
nothing to gain from that. The bar has been raised. Former "cheats" will not be
tolerated anymore.