mirror of
https://github.com/curl/curl.git
synced 2026-08-25 21:43:37 +03:00
docs/SECURITY.md -> docs/SECURITY-PROCESS.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
9c05701bed
commit
029ae11034
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
116
docs/SECURITY-PROCESS.md
Normal file
116
docs/SECURITY-PROCESS.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
|
|||
curl security process
|
||||
=====================
|
||||
|
||||
This document describes how security vulnerabilities should be handled in the
|
||||
curl project.
|
||||
|
||||
Publishing Information
|
||||
----------------------
|
||||
|
||||
All known and public curl or libcurl related vulnerabilities are listed on
|
||||
[the curl web site security page](https://curl.haxx.se/docs/security.html).
|
||||
|
||||
Security vulnerabilities should not be entered in the project's public bug
|
||||
tracker unless the necessary configuration is in place to limit access to the
|
||||
issue to only the reporter and the project's security team.
|
||||
|
||||
Vulnerability Handling
|
||||
----------------------
|
||||
|
||||
The typical process for handling a new security vulnerability is as follows.
|
||||
|
||||
No information should be made public about a vulnerability until it is
|
||||
formally announced at the end of this process. That means, for example that a
|
||||
bug tracker entry must NOT be created to track the issue since that will make
|
||||
the issue public and it should not be discussed on any of the project's public
|
||||
mailing lists. Also messages associated with any commits should not make
|
||||
any reference to the security nature of the commit if done prior to the public
|
||||
announcement.
|
||||
|
||||
- The person discovering the issue, the reporter, reports the vulnerability
|
||||
privately to `curl-security@haxx.se`. That's an email alias that reaches a
|
||||
handful of selected and trusted people.
|
||||
|
||||
- Messages that do not relate to the reporting or managing of an undisclosed
|
||||
security vulnerability in curl or libcurl are ignored and no further action
|
||||
is required.
|
||||
|
||||
- A person in the security team sends an e-mail to the original reporter to
|
||||
acknowledge the report.
|
||||
|
||||
- The security team investigates the report and either rejects it or accepts
|
||||
it.
|
||||
|
||||
- If the report is rejected, the team writes to the reporter to explain why.
|
||||
|
||||
- If the report is accepted, the team writes to the reporter to let him/her
|
||||
know it is accepted and that they are working on a fix.
|
||||
|
||||
- The security team discusses the problem, works out a fix, considers the
|
||||
impact of the problem and suggests a release schedule. This discussion
|
||||
should involve the reporter as much as possible.
|
||||
|
||||
- The release of the information should be "as soon as possible" and is most
|
||||
often synced with an upcoming release that contains the fix. If the
|
||||
reporter, or anyone else, thinks the next planned release is too far away
|
||||
then a separate earlier release for security reasons should be considered.
|
||||
|
||||
- Write a security advisory draft about the problem that explains what the
|
||||
problem is, its impact, which versions it affects, solutions or
|
||||
workarounds, when the release is out and make sure to credit all
|
||||
contributors properly.
|
||||
|
||||
- Request a CVE number from
|
||||
[distros@openwall](http://oss-security.openwall.org/wiki/mailing-lists/distros)
|
||||
when also informing and preparing them for the upcoming public security
|
||||
vulnerability announcement - attach the advisory draft for information. Note
|
||||
that 'distros' won't accept an embargo longer than 14 days and they do not
|
||||
care for Windows-specific flaws. For windows-specific flaws, request CVE
|
||||
directly from MITRE.
|
||||
|
||||
- Update the "security advisory" with the CVE number.
|
||||
|
||||
- The security team commits the fix in a private branch. The commit message
|
||||
should ideally contain the CVE number. This fix is usually also distributed
|
||||
to the 'distros' mailing list to allow them to use the fix prior to the
|
||||
public announcement.
|
||||
|
||||
- No more than 48 hours before the release, the private branch is merged into
|
||||
the master branch and pushed. Once pushed, the information is accessible to
|
||||
the public and the actual release should follow suit immediately afterwards.
|
||||
The time between the push and the release is used for final tests and
|
||||
reviews.
|
||||
|
||||
- The project team creates a release that includes the fix.
|
||||
|
||||
- The project team announces the release and the vulnerability to the world in
|
||||
the same manner we always announce releases. It gets sent to the
|
||||
curl-announce, curl-library and curl-users mailing lists.
|
||||
|
||||
- The security web page on the web site should get the new vulnerability
|
||||
mentioned.
|
||||
|
||||
Pre-notification
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
If you think you are or should be eligible for a pre-notification about
|
||||
upcoming security announcements for curl, we urge OS distros and similar
|
||||
vendors to primarily join the distros@openwall list as that is one of the
|
||||
purposes of that list - and not just for curl of course.
|
||||
|
||||
If you are not a distro or otherwise not suitable for distros@openwall and yet
|
||||
want pre-notifications from us, contact the curl security team with a detailed
|
||||
and clear explanation why this is the case.
|
||||
|
||||
curl-security (at haxx dot se)
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Who is on this list? There are a couple of criteria you must meet, and then we
|
||||
might ask you to join the list or you can ask to join it. It really isn't very
|
||||
formal. We basically only require that you have a long-term presence in the
|
||||
curl project and you have shown an understanding for the project and its way
|
||||
of working. You must've been around for a good while and you should have no
|
||||
plans in vanishing in the near future.
|
||||
|
||||
We do not make the list of participants public mostly because it tends to vary
|
||||
somewhat over time and a list somewhere will only risk getting outdated.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue